Thomas Earl McKenzie Sr. with 'mystery animal' in 1984. |
Leading up to last week’s story, more than a few readers
gave their opinions as to what Dees found on his hunting trip. Some said that
it was probably a coyote while others suggested that it might have been a river
otter or some similar creature. Others said that it was a “Chupacabra,” a
creature that may or may not exist that’s famous for attacking livestock.
One of the more interesting remarks came from Thomas Earl
McKenzie Jr., who said the animal found by Dees sounded like the same kind of
animal that his father killed in 1984. He described it as a “nasty thing,” and
said that they sent it to Auburn University, where experts there were unable to
identify it. He said that the animal had been eating his father’s calves on
Drewry Road.
On Friday, I did a deep dive into The Journals that were
published in 1984 and found the story about McKenzie’s creature. Published in
the March 15, 1984 edition of The Journal and written by Mike Qualls, the story
said that Thomas Earl McKenzie Sr. of Mexia was inspecting his cattle on March
12, 1984 when he saw a pack of about eight “dogs” taunting several of the
cattle, which were located on Fred Sheffield’s farm about a mile outside
Monroeville.
The pack had about 15 cattle surrounded when he arrived, and
McKenzie took a shot at the “dog” that appeared to the be the leader of the
pack. The pack dispersed when he killed the animal, allowing McKenzie to get a
closer look at the creature. McKenzie described the animal as “jet-black” with
features that resembled a wolf or coyote. The animal weighed between 80 and 85
pounds.
McKenzie took the animal to Monroeville pharmacist Dickie
Williams, who was a delegate to the National Wildlife Federation, in hopes that
Williams could identify it. Williams wasn’t sure what the animal was and
arranged to have it sent to the Alabama Department of Conservation and Natural
Resources for identification. They, in turn, sent it to a lab for
identification and apparently, they too were unable to do so.
In the end, it would be interesting to know if any other readers have any other ideas about what these animals could have been. It would also be interesting to know if anyone in the reading audience has had similar experiences with animals they couldn’t identify. These types of situations may be more common than we realize once we take a closer look.
No comments:
Post a Comment